GTX 1650 vs RX 5700 XT
Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (2019) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (2019).
GTX 1650
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (75 W vs 225 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($149 vs $399)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
RX 5700 XT
AMD Entry-level
- ✓ ~144% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB)
- ✓ Wider memory bus (256-bit vs 128-bit)
Verdict: The RX 5700 XT is roughly 144% faster than the GTX 1650 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The RX 5700 XT also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the GTX 1650 offers more performance per dollar, and the GTX 1650 is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | GTX 1650 | RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
| Release year | 2019 | 2019 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 5700 XT better than the GTX 1650?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 5700 XT is about 144% faster than the GTX 1650 on average.
How much faster is the RX 5700 XT than the GTX 1650?
Roughly 144% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the GTX 1650 delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.