GTX 1650 vs RX 6600 XT
Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (2019) and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (2021).
GTX 1650
NVIDIA Entry-level
- ✓ Lower power draw (75 W vs 160 W)
- ✓ Cheaper at launch ($149 vs $379)
RX 6600 XT
AMD Entry-level
- ✓ ~200% faster on average
- ✓ More VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB)
- ✓ Newer (2021 vs 2019)
- ✓ Better performance per dollar
- ✓ More power-efficient
Verdict: The RX 6600 XT is roughly 200% faster than the GTX 1650 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.
The RX 6600 XT also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.
At launch pricing, the RX 6600 XT offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6600 XT is the more power-efficient chip.
Estimated performance
Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.
Specs side by side
| Specification | GTX 1650 | RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2 |
| Release year | 2019 | 2021 |
| Est. performance | ||
| Shading units | ||
| Boost clock | ||
| FP32 compute | ||
| VRAM | ||
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | ||
| Board power | ||
| Launch MSRP |
Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX 6600 XT better than the GTX 1650?
Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6600 XT is about 200% faster than the GTX 1650 on average.
How much faster is the RX 6600 XT than the GTX 1650?
Roughly 200% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.
Which graphics card is better value?
Comparing launch prices, the RX 6600 XT delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.