Home / Graphics Cards / Compare

GTX 1650 vs RX 6650 XT

Full specification comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (2019) and the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (2022).

GTX 1650

NVIDIA Entry-level

9 / perf index
  • Lower power draw (75 W vs 176 W)
  • Cheaper at launch ($149 vs $399)

Check price →

Winner

RX 6650 XT

AMD Mid-range

29 / perf index
  • ~222% faster on average
  • More VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB)
  • Newer (2022 vs 2019)
  • Better performance per dollar
  • More power-efficient

Check price →

Verdict: The RX 6650 XT is roughly 222% faster than the GTX 1650 on average — a clear, noticeable performance advantage.

The RX 6650 XT also carries more video memory (8 GB vs 4 GB), which matters for high-resolution textures, modern AAA titles and future-proofing.

At launch pricing, the RX 6650 XT offers more performance per dollar, and the RX 6650 XT is the more power-efficient chip.

Estimated performance

GTX 1650
9
RX 6650 XT
29

Estimated average 1440p raster gaming performance compiled from publicly available benchmark data. Individual games vary.

Specs side by side

SpecificationGTX 1650RX 6650 XT
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
Release year20192022
Est. performance
9
29
Shading units
896
2,048
Boost clock
1665 MHz
2635 MHz
FP32 compute
3 TFLOPS
10.8 TFLOPS
VRAM
4 GB
8 GB
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
128-bit
Board power
75 W
176 W
Launch MSRP
$149
$399

Green bars mark the better value in each row (for power and price, lower wins).

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX 6650 XT better than the GTX 1650?

Yes — based on aggregated benchmark data, the RX 6650 XT is about 222% faster than the GTX 1650 on average.

How much faster is the RX 6650 XT than the GTX 1650?

Roughly 222% on average in raster gaming workloads. The gap varies by title, resolution and settings.

Which graphics card is better value?

Comparing launch prices, the RX 6650 XT delivers more performance per dollar. Check current street prices, as market pricing often shifts the value equation.

More comparisons